Legal Opinion
South Salt Lake City v. Terkelson
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided November 29, 2002No. 20010760-CAPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THORNE, Judge:
¶ 1 Trisha Terkelson, Ruth Stone, Amanda Morris, and Penny Payne (Defendants) argue that the City of South Salt Lake (the City) violated their due process rights when it altered its previously announced interpretation of its Sexually Oriented Business Ordinance and enforced that change without first providing Defendants notice. We reverse Defendants’ convictions and remand for further proceedings.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2 In December 1999, the South Salt Lake City Police Department directed undercover police officers to purchase “private sessions” with nude women at several local…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Cox v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Raley v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- United States v. Pennsylvania Industrial Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. SpiresCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Durham v. McDonald's Restaurants of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
- Pleasant Grove City v. OrvisCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2007
- Muscato ex rel. Butler v. MooreCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2014
- American Bush v. City of South Salt LakeUtah Supreme Court · 2006
- American Bush v. City of South Salt LakeUtah Supreme Court · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.