Krumenaker v. Dougherty
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendant, J. Hampden Dougherty, as commissioner of water supply, gas and electricity of the city of New York, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York . Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 21st day of May, 1902, continuing an injunction pendente lite.
1Opinion of the Court
Hatch, J.:
The plaintiff is the owner of premises Nos. 512-514 West One Hundred and Sixty-sixth street in the borough of Manhattan, city of New York, Upon these premises the plaintiff carries on the business of beer bottling, and also uses a part of the same for the residence of his family. Upon the premises. there has heretofore *453been installed by the city of New York a water meter for the purpose of registering the quantity of water supplied to said premises. Upon the 12th day of March, 1902, the defendant presented a water bill to the plaintiff for water used covering the period between…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Silkman v. Board of Water CommissionersNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Brass v. . RathboneNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- McEntee v. . Kingston Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of Kalamazoo v. Standard Paper Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Healy v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
- Emerson Plastronics, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1975
- Hoover v. DeffenbaughNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
- J. N. Matthews Co. v. City of BuffaloNew York Supreme Court · 1910