Legal Opinion

Healy v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 15, 1904PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal by the defendants, The City of Hew York and another, from a judgment of the Supreme Coin-t in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk-of the county of Hew York on the 29th day of June, 1903, upon the decision of the court rendered after a trial at the Hew York Special Term.

1Opinion of the Court

Ingraham, J.:

The defendant Dougherty, as commissioner of water supply, gas and electricity of the city of Hew York, threatened to cut off the supply of water furnished to certain premises leased by the plaintiff, whereupon the plaintiff commenced this action to enjoin the defendants from interfering with his supply of water. The defendants, in answer, alleged that under the rules of the department a water meter had been installed to measure the amount of water furnished to the premises occupied by the plaintiff; that this meter had been tampered with so that it measured but ohe-fifth of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Krumenaker v. DoughertyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pabst Brewing Co. v. OakleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  2. Emerson Plastronics, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1975
  3. New York University v. American Book Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  4. Gulston v. Department of FinanceNew York Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Loewenthal v. MichelsAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API