Legal Opinion

Emerson Plastronics, Inc. v. City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1975PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarry T. Nusbaum, J.

This action for a declaratory judgment was submitted to me on an agreed statement of facts to determine the liability of the plaintiffs for water meter charges levied and paid by them to the defendant, the City of New York.

The complaint sounds in equity and is addressed to the alleged patent unfairness inherent in requiring the plaintiffs to pay for thousands of gallons of water which passed through and registered on the water meter of the leased premises, but were nevertheless unused by them. The facts briefly stated are as follows:

The plaintiff, Emerson Plastronics, Inc., leased a building…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. New York University v. . American Book Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. Healy v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  3. Krumenaker v. DoughertyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  4. Pabst Brewing Co. v. OakleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  5. People ex rel. Lind v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Giacalone v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Gulston v. Department of FinanceNew York Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API