Legal Opinion

Tews v. Renzenberger, Inc.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided January 6, 2009No. Case 08-2064-JWLPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

JOHN W. LUNGSTRUM, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, individuals currently or formerly employed by defendant Renzenber-ger, Inc. as road drivers, filed this suit on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated seeking overtime compensation pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. § 207. In July 2008, the court conditionally certified this case as a collective action under 29 U.S.C. § 216(b) on behalf of all road drivers who worked for defendant at any time from August 10, 2005 to the present, other than those individuals who were employed as road drivers…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Department of Transportation v. Public CitizenSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Pueblo of Santa AnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Allen v. Coil Tubing Services, L.L.C.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2012
  2. Cerutti v. FRITO LAY, INC.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Avery v. Chariots for HireDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2010
  4. Dennis v. Watco Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  5. Brooks v. Halsted Communications, Ltd.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API