Central Valley Gas Storage, LLC v. Southam
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HOCH, J.
—This appeal arises out of a condemnation action in which Fred Southam and Southam & Son (collectively Southam) sought to introduce evidence of the value of its land for an underground natural gas storage project based on reservoir volume. The trial court’s in limine ruling excluded Southam’s valuation approach based on evidence all independently operated gas storage projects in California compensate landowners based on surface acres contributed to the project. Based on surface acre valuation testimony at trial, the jury found Southam is entitled to a minimum rent of $400 per…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. ZuckermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Atchley v. City of FresnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- City of Lincoln v. BarringerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Cheveldave v. Tri Palms Unified Owners Ass'n, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Amedee Geothermal etc. v. Lassen Municipal Utility Dist. CA3California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Amedee Geothermal etc. v. Lessen Municipal Utility Dist. CA3California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Arrieta v. Snowline Joint Unified School Dist. CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Cheveldave v. Tri Palms Unified Owners Assn.California Court of Appeal · 2018
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.