Legal Opinion

O'Connor v. Rathje

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1937No. 24409. Cause transferredPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wilson

The plaintiff, Anne O’Connor, instituted an action under article 6 of the Liquor Control law, generally referred to as the Dram Shop act, (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1937, p. 1377,) against Frank C. Rathje, as successor trustee, as the owner of a certain building located at 3439 to 3447JÍ West Madison street in Chicago. Defendant James A. Murphy, the tenant in possession, and another defendant, Frank McGovern, his business partner, operated a tavern in a portion of the premises where they sold intoxicating liquor. The fourth amended complaint charged that Joseph O’Connor, son of the plaintiff, was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Barbier v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Hackett v. SmelsleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  3. De La Cour v. De La CourIllinois Supreme Court · 1936
  4. City of Chicago v. CohnIllinois Supreme Court · 1927
  5. The People v. NiesmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Knierim v. IzzoIllinois Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Howlett v. DoglioIllinois Supreme Court · 1949
  3. The People v. LewisIllinois Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Fulford v. O'CONNORIllinois Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Hyba v. C. A. Horneman, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1939

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API