Legal Opinion

Hyba v. C. A. Horneman, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 22, 1939No. Gen. No. 9,457PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Huffman

This action was brought by appellants against appellees under the civil damage section of the Dramshop Act (sec. 135, ch. 43, Ill. Rev. Stat. 1937 [Jones Ill. Stats. Ann. 68.042]), which section provides that: 1 ‘ Every husband, wife, child, parent and ... or other person, who shall be injured, in person or property, or means of support, by any intoxicated person, or in consequence of the intoxication, ... of any person, shall have a right of action . . . severally or jointly, against any person or persons who shall, . . . have caused the intoxication, in whole or in part, of such person.”

The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cruse v. AdenIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Hackett v. SmelsleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Schroder v. CrawfordIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Brockway v. PattersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  5. O'Connor v. RathjeIllinois Supreme Court · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Lopez Ex Rel. Lopez v. MaezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Howlett v. DoglioIllinois Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Stewart v. RyanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Village of Brooten, a Municipal Corporation v. Cudahy Packing Company, a Corporation, and the Travelers Indemnity Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
  5. Fleckner v. DionneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API