Legal Opinion

People v. I. M.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 20, 2005No. A105503PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

STEIN, J.

On July 11, 2003, a Welfare and Institutions Code section 602 petition was filed against defendant I. M, then 15 years old, alleging that he had acted as an accessory after the fact in connection with a murder. (Pen. Code, § 32.) The petition also contained the enhancing allegation that defendant had committed the offense with the specific intent to benefit, promote, further or assist the unlawful conduct of a criminal street gang. (Pen. Code, § 186.22, subd. (b)(1).) The juvenile court found the petition’s allegations to be tme, placed defendant on probation, and committed…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. People v. GardeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. People v. CarpenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  4. People v. OchoaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. People v. CarbajalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. People v. PruntyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  2. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. People v. LaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  4. People v. WoodsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. People v. PLENGSANGTIPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API