Legal Opinion

People v. PLENGSANGTIP

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 19, 2007No. E039985PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KING, J.

I. INTRODUCTION

Following a preliminary hearing, defendant was held to answer on a single charge of being an accessory after the fact to the November 23, 1996, murder of Luis Garcia (Garcia). (Pen. Code, § 32.) The charge was based in part on statements defendant made to police in a February 3, 2004, interview. The superior court granted defendant’s motion to set aside the information under section 995. The People appeal, on the grounds the court misapplied the law concerning accessories and failed to defer to the magistrate’s factual findings at the preliminary hearing. We…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Rideout v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. People v. BlockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. People v. NguyenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. People v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. People v. Superior Court (Mendella)California Supreme Court · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. NucklesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. BudikWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  3. The People v. TranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. People v. ParteeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
  5. People v. MoomeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API