People v. PLENGSANGTIP
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KING, J.
I. INTRODUCTION
Following a preliminary hearing, defendant was held to answer on a single charge of being an accessory after the fact to the November 23, 1996, murder of Luis Garcia (Garcia). (Pen. Code, § 32.) The charge was based in part on statements defendant made to police in a February 3, 2004, interview. The superior court granted defendant’s motion to set aside the information under section 995. The People appeal, on the grounds the court misapplied the law concerning accessories and failed to defer to the magistrate’s factual findings at the preliminary hearing. We…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Rideout v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- People v. BlockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- People v. NguyenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- People v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- People v. Superior Court (Mendella)California Supreme Court · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- People v. NucklesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. BudikWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- The People v. TranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- People v. ParteeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
- People v. MoomeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.