Legal Opinion
People v. Woods
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 14, 2008No. A116399PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SWAGER, J.
Defendant Kendricks R. Woods appeals from the trial court’s order requiring him to pay restitution to the family of a murder victim even though he was convicted as an accessory after the fact only. We reverse.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On May 11, 2006, James Crowder was visiting with some friends on the porch of a house in Richmond. One of the friends was Burt Mascarenas. Defendant joined the group and warned them that it was not safe for them to remain at that location because he was having some problems with some other people. The group got into Mascarenas’s…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cunningham v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- People v. LentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- People v. CarbajalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. GiordanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- People v. CrowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- People v. MartinezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- People v. TarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- People v. Vo Nghia SyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- People v. SelivanovCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.