Legal Opinion

Ex parte Hudgins

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1920PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Habeas corpus by Clifton Hudgins against S, A. Daniel, Sheriff, ’ etc.

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, Judge:’. .Petitioner seeks his discharge from custody, the petition and return, of the. officer showing that he is being restrained of his liberty by the judgment of conviction by confession and sentence upon, two indictments found by the grand jury on May 13, 1920, the first, number one, charging that be.ing then and there an able bodied male resident of McDowell County, West Yirginia, between the ages of sixteen and sixty years, and not being then and there a bona fide student during school term, he did unlawfully fail and refuse to regularly and steadily engage for at least…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bailey v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. State v. Peel Splint Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Ex parte SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  4. Booth v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Lawrence v. BarlowWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. City of Portland v. GoodwinOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Walker v. PointerDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1969
  3. People v. MunozNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
  4. People v. BabbCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Morgan v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1937

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API