Morgan v. Commonwealth
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the CourtGregory, J.
The accused, James Morgan, was summoned before the police justice of the city of Norfolk UDon a warrant charging him with a violation of Code, section 2808 (as amended by Acts 1936, ch. 136), which is commonly known as the vagrancy statute. He was convicted by the police justice and upon his appeal to the corporation court his conviction was sustained. He now'' seeks a reversal of the judgment of the trial court, claiming that it is not sustained by the evidence, and that Code, section 2808, is not constitutional.
Section 2808, subsection 9 (as amended by Acts 1936, ch. 136), under which he…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pine v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1917
- Whitlock v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1906
- Ex parte SettleSupreme Court of Virginia · 1913
- The People v. BelcastroIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
- Strawberry Hill Land Corp. v. StarbuckSupreme Court of Virginia · 1918
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Trucking Corporation v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1966
- City of Portland v. GoodwinOregon Supreme Court · 1949
- United States v. Harold Stanley CloseCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1965
- Grosso v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1941
- People v. BabbCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.