Legal Opinion
Creswell Trading Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided August 15, 1996No. Consolidated Court No. 91-01-00012PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion and Order
DiCarlo, Chief Judge:
Plaintiffs, Plaintiff-intervenors and Defendant-Intervenors move for a third remand, contesting certain aspects of the Department of Commerce’s second remand determination countervailing certain portions of the subsidy provided to Indian castings exporters under India’s International Price Reimbursement Scheme (IPRS). Final Results of Redet. Pursuant to Court Remand, Creswell Trading Corp., Inc. et. al. v. United States, Slip Op. 94-65 (Dep’t Comm. Feb. 13, 1995) [hereinafter Second Remand Determination]. This court has jurisdiction pursuant to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System v. Dimension Financial Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- American Lamb Company v. The United States, and New Zealand Meat Products Board, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Creswell Trading Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Crescent Foundry Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
- Creswell Trading Co. v. Allegheny Foundry Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Allegheny Foundry Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998