Creswell Trading Co. v. Allegheny Foundry Co.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LOURIE, Circuit Judge.
Allegheny Foundry, Co. et al. (the “Domestic Industry”) and the United States appeal from the decision of the Court of International Trade in favor of Creswell Trading Co. et al. (the “Importers”) affirming Commerce’s determination that certain oceanic shipping costs and inland shipping costs did not constitute countervailable subsidies under “Item (d)” of the Illustrative List of Export Subsidies, annexed to the Agreement on Interpretation and Application of Articles VI, XVI, and XXIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (“GATT Agreement”).1 Creswell Trading…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ppg Industries, Inc. v. The United States, and Vitro Flotado, S.A. And Vidrio Plano De Mexico, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Creswell Trading Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- RSI (India) Pvt., Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Creswell Trading Co., Inc. South Bay Foundry 1989 v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
- Creswell Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
3Cited by4 opinions
- Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
- Kajaria Iron Castings Pvt. Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Allegheny Foundry Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Kajaria Iron Castings Pvt. Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998