Crescent Foundry Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion and Order
DiCarlo, Senior Judge:
This action arises from the 1990 administrative review of a countervailing duty order, first issued by the Department of Commerce in 1980, concerning certain iron metal castings from India exported to the United States, including manhole covers and frames, clean-out covers and frames, and catch basin grates and frames. Certain Iron Metal Castings from India, 60 Fed. Reg. 44,849 (Dep’t Comm. 1995) (final admin, review) [hereinafter Final Determination]; see Certain Iron Metal Castings from India, 45 Fed. Reg. 68,650 (Dep’t Comm. 1980) (original…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Wichita Board of TradeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Fairbank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Citrosuco Paulista, S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kajaria Iron Castings Pvt. Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- American Silicon Technologies v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
- Crescent Foundry Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
- Crescent Foundry Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
- Kajaria Iron Castings Pvt. Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.