Legal Opinion

Gelwicks v. Todd

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1898No. 3676PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Delta County.

1Opinion of the Court

Chieb Justice .Campbell

delivered the opinion of the court.

Action for the specific performance of a contract. The plaintiff, appellant here, was indebted to the defendant, appellee, in the sum of $3,822, evidenced by promissory notes secured by a trust deed upon town lots and agricultural lands and a water right used in irrigating the latter. As the plaintiff was unable to pay the notes, he entered into a contract with the defendant whereby he agreed to convey to her said farm lands and water right, in consideration of which she agreed to cancel and surrender to him said notes.

The defendant at…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Strickler v. City of Colorado SpringsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891
  2. Frank v. HicksWyoming Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Arnett v. LinhartSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
  4. Bloom v. WestColorado Court of Appeals · 1893

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. East Ridge of Fort Collins, LLC v. Larimer & Weld Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  2. Sturgeon v. BrooksWyoming Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Bessemer Irrigating Ditch Co. v. WoolleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1904
  4. Travelers Insurance v. ChildsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1898
  5. Denver Joint Stock Land Bank v. MarkhamSupreme Court of Colorado · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API