Sturgeon v. Brooks
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Blume, Justice.
This is an action brought by the plaintiffs against the defendants to prevent the latter from repairing the dam of the reservoir called the M G Reservoir located in the main in the NW]4 of Section 2, Township 23 North, Range 73, and extending partially into Section 35, Township 24 North, Range 73 West of the 6th P. M. Plaintiffs alleged that they are the owners of Section 2, supra; that while Margaret D. McGill and John McGill had a permit from the State Engineer of Wyoming to construct the M G Reservoir, they had no authority to construct it; that they never obtained…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Frank v. HicksWyoming Supreme Court · 1894
- Anderson v. Wyoming Development Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1944
- Horse Creek Conservation District v. Lincoln Land Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1939
- McCarthy v. Union Pac. Ry. Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1942
- Cowman v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1935
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Stutzman v. Office of the Wyoming State EngineerWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
- Rennard v. VollmarWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
- White v. Wheatland Irrigation DistrictWyoming Supreme Court · 1966
- Town of Eureka v. Office of the State EngineerNevada Supreme Court · 1992
- Kearney Lake, Land & Reservoir Co. v. Lake DeSmet Reservoir Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1970
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.