Mission Denver Co. v. Pierson
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
ERICKSON, Chief Justice.
We granted certiorari to review United Bank of Denver National Association v. Pierson, 661 P.2d 1191 (Colo.App.1982), which imposed sanctions pursuant to C.A.R. 38 for prosecution of a frivolous appeal. 1 The Court of Appeals, sua sponte, found the appeal to be frivolous and awarded damages of $500 and double costs to appellee. Because C.A.R. 38 does not spell out standards for determining when an appeal is frivolous, we granted certiorari. In our view, the appeal was not frivolous and we therefore reverse and dismiss the award of damages and double costs.
I
United Bank…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Linley v. HansonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
- Gebhardt v. GebhardtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
- Johnnie Pegues v. Morehouse Parish School BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- In Re the Marriage of MannSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- Western United Realty, Inc. v. IsaacsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Wood Bros. Homes, Inc. v. HowardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- Avery v. SteeleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
- Castillo v. Koppes-ConwayColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
- Board of County Commissioners v. AuslaenderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.