Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Pursell
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided January 10, 2011No. 09SA119PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice
Mark Anderson ("Anderson") challenges an April 3, 2009, water court order that granted attorney fees and costs to Henry R. Sebesta and Mary M. Sebesta Revocable Trust and C & KX Properties, Inc. (collectively "Sebesta"), and Richard Pursell ("Pursell") for various stages of the litigation. We hold that the water court was correct in granting attorney fees and costs associated with the Final Decree to Pursell because he was the "prevailing party" under the parties' Water Agreement. Further, the water court was correct in both the award and the amount of attorney fees and costs to both Sebesta…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Ramos v. LammCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- Rathke v. MacFarlaneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- American Water Development, Inc. v. City of AlamosaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- USI Properties East, Inc. v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Janicek v. Obsideo, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2011
- Planning Partners International, LLC v. QED, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2013
- Smith v. KinninghamColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
- Lester v. Career Building AcademyColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
- DeJean v. GroszColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.