Legal Opinion
O'Neal v. Peaden
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided December 21, 1933No. 4 Div. 739PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, Justice.
Action of assumpsit by the appellee against the appellants to recover the amount of an indebtedness due to the appellee from the Andalusia National Bank, evidenced by a certificate of deposit in words and figures as follows:
“The Andalusia National Bank No/103 “Andalusia, Ala. October 23rd, 1931
“Mrs. Nela Peaden has deposited in this bank Ten Thousand and no/100 Dollars $10,-000.00 Payable to the order of herself twelve months after date on the return of this certificate properly endorsed. Interest at rate of 4%, payable quarterly.
“D. E. Fletcher, Vice-President, Cashier.”
On the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Leftkovitz v. First National Bank of GadsdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
- Donley v. CampSupreme Court of Alabama · 1853
- Espalla v. Richard & SonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
- Noble v. Beeman-Spaulding-Woodward Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1913
- Carothers v. CallahanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Spragins v. McCalebSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Pointer v. Farmers' Fertilizer Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- O'Neal v. ClarkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Clark v. O'NealSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- Dionne v. First Alabama Bank (In Re XYZ Options, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1998