O'Neal v. Clark
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
BOULDIN, Justice.
The questions presented on this appeal con* cern the liability of indorsers on a certifl cate of deposit issued by a bank.
Indorsers claim a discharge for want of presentment and notice of dishonor.
Following the order in which questions are presented in brief, we consider the cause on the merits, as presented by the evidence, which is without dispute.
On January 1, 1932, the Andalusia National Bank issued to Dr. Franklin A. Clark, plaintiff, a certificate of deposit for $12,000 in usual form “payable to the order of himself 12 months after date on the return of this certificate…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Saltmarsh v. TuthillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1848
- Case v. McKinnisOregon Supreme Court · 1923
- Elmore County Bank v. AvantSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- Marks v. First National BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
- Calkins v. VaughanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Thompson v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Humphrey v. Quality Cleaners and LaundrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Pointer v. Farmers' Fertilizer Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- Owens v. WoodAlabama Court of Appeals · 1966
- Woodlawn Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.