Legal Opinion

Carothers v. Callahan

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 1, 1922No. 6 Div. 655PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMidler, J.

T. J. Callahan, Jr., and J. M. Kilpatrick bring this suit against William Carothers as an indorser on a promissory note. There was judgment by default against the defendant, and from this judgment the defendant prosecutes this appeal. The defendant is sued as indorser on the note under the following agreement in writing made by him:

“For value received, I hereby guarantee the payment of the within note and any renewal of the same in force and effect as a joint maker primarily liable thereon, and hereby waive protest, demand and all notice of nonpayment thereof.”

The defendant insists the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  2. Ex parte Branch & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1879
  3. Hopkins v. DuggarSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  4. Goetter, Weil & Co. v. PickettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1878
  5. Hooper v. StrahanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Knowles v. BlueSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  2. Moore v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  3. Mt. Vernon-Woodberry Mills v. Union Springs Guano Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  4. Hamill v. McCallaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  5. Spragins v. McCalebSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API