Legal Opinion

Swensen v. Bender

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 3, 1902No. 720PublishedCited by 16 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of California.

1Opinion of the Court

HAWLEY, District Judge.

This action was brought by the defendant in error to recover damages for injuries alleged to have been received by him through the negligence of the plaintiffs in error, who were contractors engaged in the construction of the Third Street tunnel in Los Angeles, Cal. A trial of the case before a jury resulted in a verdict in favor of the defendant in error for $1,592.75, upon which verdict a judgment was duly rendered, and thereafter a writ of error was taken to have said judgment and all proceedings had in said cause reviewed by this court.

The errors relied upon for a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Northern Pacific Railroad v. HerbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. ArchibaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Northern Pacific Railroad v. PetersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. BarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. Union Pac. Ry. Co. v. JarviCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1892

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Weed v. Lyons Petroleum Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1923
  2. Dunagan v. Appalachian Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1929
  3. Napier v. GreenzweigCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
  4. Mountain Copper Co. v. Van BurenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1904
  5. Stockslager v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1902

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API