Legal Opinion

Buckley v. Silverberg

California Supreme Court

Decided August 7, 1896No. S. F. No. 156PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. John Hunt, Judge. The facts are stated in. the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Haynes, C.

This action was brought to recover from the defendant the sum of one thousand and thirty-two *675dollars, the price of certain calves and beef cattle sold by plaintiff to defendant. A jury trial was had, and plaintiff obtained a verdict and judgment for said sum, with interest from March 5, 1894, and from said judgment and from an order denying a new trial the defendant appeals.

Defendant is a wholesale butcher doing business in San Francisco, and plaintiff also resides in said city, but owns a ranch at Goshen, in Tulare county, and had cattle thereon. Con O’Neill was plaintiff’s manager…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Tognazzini v. FreemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  2. Spurrier Lumber Co. v. DodsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. County First National Bank v. Coast Dairies & Land Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. Sanger v. BaconIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Hunt v. Douglas Lumber Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1933

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API