Legal Opinion

In Re Acker

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 30, 1984No. Crim. 17492PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CROSBY, J.

Does a prison sentence recalled pursuant to Penal Code section 1170, subdivision (d) constitute a “prior separate prison term” which may be used to enhance a new offense under section 667.5? We hold it does not.

I

In 1978 Gordon Acker was convicted of burglary (§ 459); the sentence was suspended, and he was placed on five years’ probation. He violated the terms of probation, however, and was sentenced to three years in prison in 1979. A diagnostic study was prepared in which the Director of Corrections recommended Acker’s sentence be recalled and probation granted (§ 1170,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Neal v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. In Re DixonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. In Re ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  4. In Re SpearsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. People v. Michael S.California Court of Appeal · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  2. People v. AcostaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. People v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. People v. AriasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. People v. TorresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API