In Re Acker
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CROSBY, J.
Does a prison sentence recalled pursuant to Penal Code section 1170, subdivision (d) constitute a “prior separate prison term” which may be used to enhance a new offense under section 667.5? We hold it does not.
I
In 1978 Gordon Acker was convicted of burglary (§ 459); the sentence was suspended, and he was placed on five years’ probation. He violated the terms of probation, however, and was sentenced to three years in prison in 1979. A diagnostic study was prepared in which the Director of Corrections recommended Acker’s sentence be recalled and probation granted (§ 1170,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Neal v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- In Re DixonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- In Re ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- In Re SpearsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- People v. Michael S.California Court of Appeal · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- People v. AcostaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- People v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- People v. AriasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- People v. TorresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020