Legal Opinion

Deitch v. City of Chattanooga

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1953PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gailor

Defendants appeal from fines imposed for the violation of certain gaming ordinances of the City of Chattanooga. On warrants which charged separately (1) gaming, and (2) possession of gaming devices, judgments were rendered against Defendants in City Court, and on appeal, the judgments were affirmed in the Criminal Court, where the charges against the two Defendants, though presented in five separate warrants, were heard together de novo.

From the City’s evidence, which was the oral testimony of a police officer, with exhibits to his testimony, it appeared: (1) That both Defendants had offices…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mobile, Jackson & Kansas City Railroad v. TurnipseedSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. United States v. KahrigerSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Kelly v. ConnerTennessee Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Brinkley v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Diamond v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Marchetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Clark v. Metropolitan Government of NashvilleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1991
  3. Grigsby v. MitchumSupreme Court of Kansas · 1963
  4. City of Chattanooga v. MyersTennessee Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County v. AllenTennessee Supreme Court · 1975

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API