Legal Opinion

City of Chattanooga v. Myers

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1990PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COOPER, Justice.

The issue in this case is whether a defendant, who has been convicted of a violation of a city ordinance, is entitled to a jury trial on appeal of the judgment of the municipal court, where demand for a jury trial is made in accordance with Rule 38.03 of the Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure.

The defendant was charged with violation of the “Adult-Oriented Establishment Ordinance” of the City of Chattanooga. The ordinance defines an “adult-oriented establishment,” provides for their licensing, and proscribes certain acts and conduct. Section 14(g) of the ordinance…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Waller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Dyke v. Taylor Implement Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Willard v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Pass v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1944

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. City of Chattanooga v. DavisTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  2. City of Bartlett v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1991
  3. City of Jackson v. Jeff ButlerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
  4. Town of Nolensville v. KingTennessee Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Vandergriff v. City of ChattanoogaDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1998

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API