Legal Opinion

Rosen v. Texas Company

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 16, 1958PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIMOCK, District Judge.

Defendant moves for orders (1) under Rule 12(b) F.R.Civ.P., to dismiss this action for failure of the complaint to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, and, in the alternative (2) under Rule 12(f), to strike out a certain allegation as redundant, a conclusion of law and scandalous, and (3) under Rule 12 (e), for a more definite statement.

Plaintiff sues for treble damages alleged to have resulted from a violation of the Robinson-Patman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 13. The complaint alleges that plaintiff maintains a gasoline station in Nassau County, that defendant sells…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Julius Nagler v. Admiral CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
  3. American Machine & Metals, Inc. v. De Bothezat Impeller Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1948
  4. United Grocers' Co. v. Sau-Sea Foods, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1957

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Lehmann Trading Corporation v. J & H STOLOW, INC.District Court, S.D. New York · 1960
  2. Gann v. Bernzomatic CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
  3. Societe Comptoir De L'Industrie Cotonniere v. Alexander's Department Stores, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1961
  4. Freeman v. KirbyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
  5. Williams v. Humble Oil & Refining CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1964

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API