Legal Opinion
Reynolds Metals Co. v. Metals Disintegrating Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 27, 1949No. 9840PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’CONNELL, Circuit Judge.
The instant complaint seeks reformation of a license agreement between plaintiff (“Reynolds”) and defendant (“Metals Disintegrating”) and the refund to Reynolds of certain royalty payments made in connection therewith to Metals Disintegrating. After extensive and, prolonged pre-trial proceedings at which all the available information was stated to have been adduced, the court below granted the motion of Metals Disintegrating to dismiss the complaint as legally insufficient. D.C.N.J.1948, 8 F.R.D. 349. Both litigants have expressed the desire that the record on this…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Ethyl Gasoline Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Frederick Hart & Co. v. Recordgraph CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Bates v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Cameron v. International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employes & Moving Picture Operators of the United States & Canada, Local Union No. 384Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Pollack v. City of Newark, NJDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1956
- Lektro-Vend Corp. v. Vendo CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1975
- Guthrie v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1974
- Freeman v. KirbyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
- Farbenfabriken Bayer A.G. v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.