Legal Opinion
Amalgamated Transit Union AFL-CIO v. Donovan
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 24, 1984No. Civ. A. 82-2042PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
THOMAS F. HOGAN, District Judge.
Under the Urban Mass Transportation Act, 49 U.S.C. § 1601, et seq. (“the Act” or “UMTA”), the Secretary of Labor (“Secretary”) must determine whether the terms of collective bargaining agreements entered between Unions and their transit companies meet the labor-protective requirements of the Act before he can disburse federal funds to that transit company. In this case, 1 Local Division 732, an unincorporated labor organization and local division of the Amalgamated Transit Union (“ATU” or “Local 732”), AFI^CIO, with its headquarters in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Wichita Board of TradeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
- International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union v. Raymond J. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Amalgamated Transit Union International, Afl-Cio v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Greenfield and Montague Transportation Area v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary, Dept. Of LaborCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- Amalgamated Transit Union International, Afl-Cio v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Amalgamated Transit Union International, Afl-Cio v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985