Legal Opinion

Estate of braden/gabaldon v. State

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 2011No. CV-10-0300-PRPublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRUTINEL, Justice.

¶ 1 The issue in this case is whether the Adult Protective Services Act (“APSA”), AR.S. § 46-455 (2011), subjects the state to an action for damages under that statute. We hold that it does not and, therefore, affirm the superior court’s summary judgment in favor of the State.

I

¶ 2 Jacob Braden, an adult with developmental disabilities, received services from Arizona Integrated Residential and Educational Services (“AIRES”), a licensed private corporation that contracted with the Arizona Department of Economic Security's Division of Developmental Disabilities to…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Pinter v. DahlSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Deal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Stone v. Arizona Highway CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  4. In Re Equity Funding Corp. of America Securities LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1976
  5. Goodyear Aircraft Corp. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1945

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. The ESTATE OF JOSEFA U. DeCAMACHO v. LA SOLANA CARE AND REHAB, INC.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  2. James C. Sell v. Hon. gama/squire & CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Metzler v. Bci Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Los Angeles, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Cornerstone Hospital of Southeast Arizona v. Ernest H. BlackburnCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  5. Glover v. GloverCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API