Estate of braden/gabaldon v. State
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUTINEL, Justice.
¶ 1 The issue in this case is whether the Adult Protective Services Act (“APSA”), AR.S. § 46-455 (2011), subjects the state to an action for damages under that statute. We hold that it does not and, therefore, affirm the superior court’s summary judgment in favor of the State.
I
¶ 2 Jacob Braden, an adult with developmental disabilities, received services from Arizona Integrated Residential and Educational Services (“AIRES”), a licensed private corporation that contracted with the Arizona Department of Economic Security's Division of Developmental Disabilities to…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Pinter v. DahlSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Deal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Stone v. Arizona Highway CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- In Re Equity Funding Corp. of America Securities LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1976
- Goodyear Aircraft Corp. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1945
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- The ESTATE OF JOSEFA U. DeCAMACHO v. LA SOLANA CARE AND REHAB, INC.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- James C. Sell v. Hon. gama/squire & CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 2013
- Metzler v. Bci Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Los Angeles, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 2014
- Cornerstone Hospital of Southeast Arizona v. Ernest H. BlackburnCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- Glover v. GloverCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.