Legal Opinion

Robichaud v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided December 12, 1949PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSwepston, J.

This suit arose out of three joint adventure contracts among the three complainants and the defendant.

The three contracts covered respectively dirt moving jobs known as the Meridian (Miss.) job, the Mansfield (La.) job and the Modoc (Ark) job, the first two being Army Air Bases and the third the Levee along the Mississippi River, during most of the year 1943 and up to January 1944, which, of course, was during the World War II era.

Defendant Smith was at the inception of this partnership an established contractor of many years experience. All three complainants had worked for Smith for many…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wootton Land & Fuel Co. v. OwnbeyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920
  2. Nashville Packet Co. v. NevilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Staub v. Sewanee Coal, Coke & Land Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Smith v. FrazierTennessee Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Myers v. BennettTennessee Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Malekzadeh v. WyshockCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1992
  2. Hunt v. Temco, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1969
  3. Huntington v. LumpkinCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API