Legal Opinion
The Timken Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided August 28, 1996No. Slip Op. No. 96-149. Court No. 95-02-00214PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TSOUCALAS, Judge:
Plaintiff, The Timken Company (“Timken”), brings this action pursuant to Rule 56.2 of the Rules of this Court for judgment upon the agency record contesting the decision of the Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration (“Commerce”), to apply the scope determination entitled Final Affirmative Determination in Scope Inquiry on Antidumping Duty Order on Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof From Japan (“Scope Determination”), 60 Fed. Reg. 6519 (1995), to only pending and future reviews.
Background
On October 6, 1987, Commerce published an antidumping…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Timken Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hoogovens Staal BV v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
- Shieldalloy Metallurgical Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
- Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
- Hoogovens Staal BV v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
- Timken Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.