Legal Opinion

United States v. Pownall

District Court, S.D. California

Decided March 22, 1946No. 4771PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YANKWICH, District Judge.

By its complant, the Government seeks to recover excess profits in the sum of $113,-709.19, with interest at the rate of six per cent per annum, from March 13, 1945, earned by the defendants on a war contract, as determined on December 27, 1944, by the War Contracts Price Adjustment Board under the Renegotiation Act of 1942 (Public Law 753, 77th Congress, 2nd session, Title VIII; 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix § 1191), as amended and reenacted by the Revenue Act of 1943 (Public Law 235, 78th Congress, 2nd session, Sec. 701; 50 U.S. C.A.Appendix § 1191). The determination is now…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Hirabayashi v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Korematsu v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lichter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Lichter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
  3. S. S. Silberblatt, Inc. v. Renegotiation BoardUnited States Tax Court · 1969
  4. Lichter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. S. S. Silberblatt, Inc. v. Renegotiation BoardUnited States Tax Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API