United States v. Pownall
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
YANKWICH, District Judge.
By its complant, the Government seeks to recover excess profits in the sum of $113,-709.19, with interest at the rate of six per cent per annum, from March 13, 1945, earned by the defendants on a war contract, as determined on December 27, 1944, by the War Contracts Price Adjustment Board under the Renegotiation Act of 1942 (Public Law 753, 77th Congress, 2nd session, Title VIII; 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix § 1191), as amended and reenacted by the Revenue Act of 1943 (Public Law 235, 78th Congress, 2nd session, Sec. 701; 50 U.S. C.A.Appendix § 1191). The determination is now…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Hirabayashi v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Korematsu v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lichter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Lichter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
- S. S. Silberblatt, Inc. v. Renegotiation BoardUnited States Tax Court · 1969
- Lichter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- S. S. Silberblatt, Inc. v. Renegotiation BoardUnited States Tax Court · 1969