S. S. Silberblatt, Inc. v. Renegotiation Board
United States Tax Court
Held, Capehart housing contract subject to the 1951 Renegotiation Act and such prospective application is not unconstitutional under the fifth amendment.
1Opinion of the Court
S. S. Silberblatt, Inc., and the Sterling Company, Petitioners v. the Renegotiation Board, Respondent
S. S. Silberblatt, Inc. v. Renegotiation Board
Docket No. 1041-R
United States Tax Court
51 T.C. 907; 1969 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 178;
March 4, 1969, Filed
Held, Capehart housing contract subject to the 1951 Renegotiation Act and such prospective application is not unconstitutional under the fifth amendment.
Edward J. Ross, for the petitioners.
Michael R. Lemov, and Stephen M. Truitt, for the respondent.
Mulroney, Judge.
MULRONEY
OPINION
A consolidated renegotiation proceeding was held by respondent with…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Hirabayashi v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Lichter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Currin v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.