Legal Opinion
Jackson v. Com. of Ky.
District Court, E.D. Kentucky
Decided June 21, 1995No. Civ. A. 93-65, 94-38, 95-18 and 95-39PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WEHRMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The individual plaintiffs in this consolidated ease are employees of the Commonwealth of Kentucky. The plaintiffs allege that the Commonwealth misclassified them as “exempt” employees under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) and claim that the Commonwealth owes them overtime pay for hours they worked in excess of 40 per week during the three year period preceding the filing of their complaints. Under the FLSA, non-exempt employees must be paid a minimum wage as well as “overtime” at a rate of one and one-half times…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- New York v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- National League of Cities v. UserySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cash v. Conn Appliances, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1997
- Arrington v. City of MacOnDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1997
- Demos v. City of IndianapolisDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2000
- McCloskey v. Triborough Bridge & Tunnel AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Meringolo v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995