Legal Opinion
Tang v. C.A.R.S. Protection Plus, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided April 3, 2007No. 2006AP1540PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCurley, J.
¶ 1. C.A.R.S. Protection Plus, Inc. (CARS) appeals from the judgment entered in favor of Thomas Tang, determining that CARS breached its contract with Tang and awarding Tang attorney's fees under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (Magnuson-Moss Act or the act). CARS contends that the trial court erred in concluding that it breached the contract because the trial court's factual findings regarding Tang's and O'Reilly Motors's (O'Reilly) communications with CARS were clearly erroneous, and because the trial court erred in finding that under the terms of the contract, CARS was not allowed to demand…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- John F. "Jack" Walsh v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- Hartung v. HartungWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- Danbeck v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
- Noll v. Dimiceli's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
- Jones v. JenkinsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Ehlinger v. HauserCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2008
- H-D Michigan, LLC v. Sovie's Cycle Shop, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 2009
- Schuetta v. Aurora National Life Assurance Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2014
- McGuire v. American Family Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Federal Insurance Company v. TDS Metrocom, LLCDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2022
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.