Legal Opinion

Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company v. Allnet Communication Services, Inc., Cross-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 7, 1994No. 92-4044, 92-4170PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judge.

The district court granted summary judgment in the amount of $185,000 to plaintiff, Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company (“CBT”) 810 F.Supp. 217. This amount reflected access service charges that defendant, Allnet Communication Services, Inc. (“Allnet”), had refused to pay.

Allnet appeals both the summary judgment and the district court’s denial of a stay in the proceedings pending a decision by the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”).

While we affirm the district court’s order directing Allnet to pay CBT for services rendered, we vacate and remand for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Reiter v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Robert v. McDonald v. Union Camp CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  4. Burlington Northern Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Joseph J. Flacche and Ella M. Flacche v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada (u.s.)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Digitel, Inc. v. MCI Worldcom, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  2. McCoy v. General Motors Corp.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1998
  3. Advamtel, LLC v. at & T Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2000
  4. Premiere Network Services, Inc. v. SBC Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
  5. Advamtel, LLC v. at & T Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2000

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API