Legal Opinion

Ragan v. . Ragan

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 14, 1923PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

In the case of Bridges v. Pleasants, 39 N. C., 26, cited and approved at this term by Rohe, J., in Weaver v. Kirby, ante, 387, the facts are that a good man, Stephen Justice, made his will and, after making certain bequests, directed, “After my will is complied with, after the above directions, it is my will that $1,000, if there be so much remaining, be applied to foreign missions and to the poor saints; this to be disposed of and applied as my executor may think the proper objects, according to the scriptures,” etc. The plaintiffs filed a bill in equity, under the old practice, against the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Tate v. . MottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  2. Cole v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Tinsley v. . HoskinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  4. Bridges v. . PleasantsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1845
  5. Maxwell v. . ToddSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. SchneiderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Long v. Town of RockinghamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  3. Bowman v. Comfort Chair CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. Parker v. Mecklenburg Realty & InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  5. In Re Will of HowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API