Cole v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
Certiorari to review an order of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMyrick, J.
A writ of review was granted on the application of petitioner to review the action of the Superior Court had upon the following state of facts: •—
Catharine McKeever, an insane woman, and John McKeever, Jane McKeever, and Mary McKeever, minors, by their guardian ad litem, Margaret Hayes, commenced an action against the *87Market Street Railway Company, to recover damages for the death of Daniel McKeever, the husband of said Catharine, and the father of said minors. The said guardian ad litem employed the petitioner, E. P. Cole, Esq., an attorney at law, to commence and prosecute said action as…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In Re PaschalSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Gurnee v. MaloneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
3Cited by37 opinions
- Dionisio v. Dacanay and Reynaldo C. Dacanay, by His Father and Next Friend v. Saturnina Mendoza, Victor P. Mendoza, and Doe Insurance Co. No. 1Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Berry v. ChaplinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Sarracino v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Denio v. City of Huntington BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Serway v. GalentineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.