Legal Opinion

Parker v. Mecklenburg Realty & Insurance

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 23, 1928PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBkogdeN, J.

Two questions of law are presented, to wit:

1. In an action to set aside a deed of trust upon, the ground of fraudulent representation in the procurement thereof as a cloud upon title, is an amendment to the complaint at the trial, permitting the recovery of damages for the alleged fraud, within the power of the court?

2. Are attorneys’ fees incurred in setting aside such an instrument upon the ground of fraud a proper element of damages?

The answer to the first proposition depends upon whether or not the amendment permitted by the court wrought such a change in the pleadings as to constitute…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Stringfield v. HirschTennessee Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Dockery v. Fairbanks-Morse Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  3. Turner v. . BogerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  4. Shute v. . ShuteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  5. Mordecai v. DevereuxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Stillwell Enterprises, Inc. v. Interstate Equipment Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Hopkins v. . BarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. SchneiderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Bowman v. Comfort Chair CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. Queen City Coach Co. v. Lumberton Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API