In Re Will of Howell
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
After probate in common form, a caveat was filed to the will of M. T. Howell, based upon alleged mental incapacity and undue influence. The matter was transferred to the civil issue docket for trial. The case was heard and a mistrial ordered when the jury failed to agree. There was evidence pro and con on the issue of mental capacity, but none to support the allegation of undue influence. Erom an order directing the executor to pay out of the estate counsel fees to attorneys for caveators pending further proceedings, the propounders and executor appeal.
Under the Eevised Code of 1854, chap.…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Trustees v. GreenoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Harrison v. PereaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Tinsley v. . HoskinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
- City of Durham v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Turner v. . BogerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hopkins v. . BarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Bowman v. Comfort Chair CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Lightner v. . BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Queen City Coach Co. v. Lumberton Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Hilgreen v. . Cleaners Tailors Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.