Webster v. Crump
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
RAX, C.
Plaintiff appeals from an order quashing- the summons and setting aside the service. The defendant says it is not an appealable order.
I'll the case of Richardson et al. v. Howard, 51 Okla. 240, 151 Pac. 887, language is used indicating that an order quashing service is not an appealable order, but it was expressly s.tated that a decision of the question was not necessary to a proper disposition of the case, and that the question was not there determined. Section 780, C. S. 1921, authorizes an appeal to this court from a final order. A final order is defined by section 781:
“An…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. AustinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Lookabaugh v. EppersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Richardson v. HowardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Rogers v. McCord-collins Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
- Welch v. LaddSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Axelrod v. Osage Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
- Gilliland v. Chronic Pain Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Jameson v. HarvelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Mills v. District Court of Lincoln CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- State Ex Rel. Murray v. Mortgage Security Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.