Legal Opinion
Jameson v. Harvel
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 1, 1929No. 18436PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.
Plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff commenced this action in the district court of Oklahoma county against the defendants in error, hereinafter referred to as defendants, by filing his petition and causing the summons to issue to Oklahoma county for the defendant Mary E. Jameson and to Kay county for the defendant Albert L. Harvel. Personal service was had upon each of the defendants.
The petition contained three causes of action separately stated and numbered, the first of which was against both of the defendants. and the second and third of which were against the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. AustinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Goldsborough v. HewittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Lookabaugh v. EppersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Rogers v. McCord-collins Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
- Welch v. LaddSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- McDonald v. McDonaldIdaho Supreme Court · 1934
- Mills v. District Court of Lincoln CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Osborn v. White Eagle Oil CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Summers v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.