Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Tonkonogoff
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided December 17, 1941PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Foley, S.
The ancillary administrator has accounted for his transactions in the pending proceeding and seeks a judicial settlement.
The questions presented for determination in this decision were raised by objections filed to the account by Michael Kosolapoff, an alleged creditor of the estate whose claim was rejected by the ancillary administrator. The claim had been the subject of an action brought by Kosolapoff against the representative of the estate in the Supreme Court, New York County. By the requisite formal orders that action was transferred from the Supreme Court to this- court and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- The HarrisburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Slater v. Mexican National RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Davis v. MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Swift & Co. v. Bankers Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1939
- F. A. Straus & Co. v. Canadian Pacific Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pack v. Beech Aircraft CorporationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1957
- Bank of Boston International of Miami v. Arguello TefelDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1986
- American Cities Co. v. StevensonNew York Supreme Court · 1946
- Florence M. Clarke v. The Pennsylvania Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- Prouty v. DrakeNew York Supreme Court · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.