F. A. Straus & Co. v. Canadian Pacific Railway Co.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtHubbs, J.
The defendant, a common carrier, undertook to carry, under a through bill of lading, a quantity of silk from Shanghai, China, via Vancouver, to New York city, consigned to order, notify F. A. Straus & Co., Inc. When the boat upon which the silk was shipped reached Vancouver, it was discovered that three bales of silk had been stolen from the silk room in which it had been placed at Shanghai. This is an action in conversion to recover the value of the silk stolen. The trial court submitted to the jury, without objection on the part of the defendant, the following issues:
First. Did the theft of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Union Pacific Railroad v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- St. Johns N. F. Shipping Corp. v. . S. A. Companhia Geral Commercial Do Rio De JaneiroSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- The KensingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- People v. . HawkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by88 opinions
- Mertz v. MertzNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Hammelburger v. Foursome Inn Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Swift & Co. v. Bankers Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Rubin v. Irving Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Recovery Consultants, Inc. v. Shih-HsiehAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.