Legal Opinion
Prouty v. Drake
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 6, 1959PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHarold Baer, J.
This action was tried before the court without a jury. Formal findings of fact and conclusions of law were waived.
This case was tried previously and the judgment reversed (Prouty v. Drake, 4 A D 2d 864). The evidence adduced at the first trial, set forth in the printed record, was admitted by consent as the evidence in the current trial. Additional documents, part of the matrimonial action between the parties in New Jersey, were also admitted into evidence.
The parties were divorced in the State of New Jersey in 1942. An interlocutory decree was entered on March 23, 1942 and the final decree…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Crow v. . GleasonNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Gilmore v. . HamNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Keys v. LeopoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Manufacturers Trust Co. v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- National Surety Co. v. RuffinNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Legel Braswell Government Securities Corporation, Bankrupt. Plano Savings & Loan Association v. Irving Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- City of New York v. BetancourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1974
- 269 Associates v. YerkesCivil Court of the City of New York · 1982
- In re the Estate of FoxNew York Surrogate's Court · 1981