Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Stuhlfire

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided January 3, 1990No. 88-P-511PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

As styled by the named plaintiffs, the complaint was brought by them “On Behalf of Themselves and All Other Fellowship Members,” that is, the membership of the Norfolk Fellowship Foundation, Inc. (NFF). The allegations of the complaint speak to violations of the laws of the Commonwealth (without reference to any specific statute) and of the rights of the membership majority. Damages were sought on behalf of the membership, payable to the NFF. Concluding that the action was a derivative one, the judge allowed the defendants’ motion for summary judgment on the stated bases that the plaintiffs…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WakelinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  2. Pupecki v. James Madison Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  3. S. Solomont & Sons Trust, Inc. v. New England Theatres Operating Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  4. Bessette v. BessetteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  5. Appleton v. Town of HudsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. In Re Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Fee LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
  2. Halebian v. BervCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  3. In Re Franklin Mutual Funds Fee LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2005
  4. Stegall v. LadnerDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
  5. Forsythe v. Sun Life Financial, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API