Legal Opinion

In Re Franklin Mutual Funds Fee Litigation

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided September 22, 2005No. MASTER FILE 04-CV-982PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MARTINI, District Judge.

This is a putative class action brought on behalf of all persons or entities who owned one or more shares of the named Franklin and Templeton Mutual Funds against Franklin Resources, Inc. and its subsidiaries and affiliates for, among other reasons, charging mutual fund investors excessive fees and expenses, disseminating materially false and misleading information, and improperly paying brokers to steer unsuspecting investors into the Franklin and Templeton Mutual Funds. Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss the Consolidated Amended Complaint pursuant to Rules…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. Pirate Investor LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
  2. In Re Salomon Smith Barney Mutual Fund Fees LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
  3. North Sound Capital LLC v. Merck & Co IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
  4. Northstar Financial Advisors, Inc. v. Schwab InvestmentsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. Forsythe v. Sun Life Financial, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API